Inequality in civil society
Friday, February 10th, 2006
Am reading pop philosopher Alain de Botton’s Status Anxiety, and I’m reading a chapter on Meritocracy. I am re-familiarizing myself with Jean-Jacques Rosseau’s argument on social inequality.
Rosseau said that the powerful had, since the dawn of time, assumed and maintained their position by means of robbery: "The first person who, having enclosed a plot of land, took it into his head to say this is mine an found people simple enough to believe him, was the true founder of civil society. What crimes, wars, murders, what miseries and horrors would the human race have been spared, had someone pulled up the stakes or filled in the dicth and cried out to his fellow men: "Do not listen to this impostor. You are lost if you forget that the fruits of the earth belong to all and the earth to no one!" (Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, 1754).
Back during my SocSci and Philosophy classes in UP,when I still wasn’t tibak, I always felt uncomfortable with the explanations my professors offered about civil society. That it was possible for the governed and the govern to work together in harmony, without conflict just so long as there was constant consultation.
None of the explanations mentioned the specifics of economic or political interests of those governing and the governed. There were, however, the supposedly given considerations on the fact of nobility of the governed as they chosen by virtue of skill, wealth, intelligence, etc etc and thus they can and should be expected to think of what is primarily to the benefit of society at large. Thus can they be expected to cooperate with those governed and guide them towards improving their lot in life.
Such naivete, I thought. Civil society exists in a vacuum. And the real world isn’t it.
Those in the so-called Civil Society in the Philippines go only so far as to to point the ills in society; but when it comes to the presentation of alternatives, the house of cards falls apart. The so-called civil society groups in the Philippines refuse to acknowledge the class differences in society, and admit that these differences are at the core of social conflict.
The brains of these civil society groups agitate themselves over long and seemingly erudite observations and explanations on why the Philippines remains such a violent, turbulent and backward country, but the most they can come up with is corruption. They simply do no want to admit that the sectors - or more precisely classes - in society are in constant upheaval because their interests intrinsically oppose and attack each other.
Or rather, the classes in power undermine the welfare of those classes not in power.
Civil society groups refuse to go near the genuine roots of inequality because among themselves there are those who tend these roots and keep them sturdy, firmly imbedded in the very foundations of Philippine society, it’s politics, economy, and culture.
Among themselves there are those to whom the perpetuation of inequality would prove most efficacious in their goal to maintain their own high standards of living, improve their own quality of life, and increase their own status in society.
They will only do battle when their own welfare is affected; or when their supposed ‘moral sensibilities’ are affronted or slighted.
A hundred years after Rosseau, Karl Marx expounded on the latter’s theory and made his arguments and justifications for them more scientific. He said that however humane the burgeoisie might seem (even those in civil society, affecting or expressing concern for the general ills that plague mankind), monstrosities in nature and character abound beneath the surface.
"You may be a model citizen, perhaps a member of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, and have the odour of sanctity to boot,but you are a creature with no heart in its breast." (Das Kapital,Volume 1, 1887)
Reminds me of Lucio Tan who stole billions in taxes that could have been used to build schools or hospitals, but he gives to charity. In 1998, he brought thousands of those white and red Petron Christmas lasterns which cost about 5,000 each and the proceeds were for charity. The parols were hung in various Churches all over the metropolis.
Then there’s Henry Sy. His SM group of companies have these donation boxes set up in the malls, encouraging people to donate used clothes, books, toys,etc for orphans. Yet what does Henry Sy do? He hires workers on a contractual basis — to deny them the rights of regular workers such as collective bargaining and joining progressive unions which will represent their economic rights. So he won’t have to pay for sick leaves, vacation leaves and lose more than 1 percent of his yearly profits.
Don’t let me get started on the hypocrites who are the Lopezes. I would very much like to admire Bantay Bata of the ABS-CBN Foundation, but fuck,if the Lopezes would only quit stealing from their Meralco company customers through robbery-level electrity rates, it wouldn’t be so hard for me to applaud their efforts at saving kids. The Lopezes steal from the parents, so doesn’t that mean by extension that they’re also stealing from the children?
And so on and so on with the members of the Makati Business Club, the ECOP, the Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry who are also involved in civil society and its efforts.
I don’t believe in civil society, but I believe that power does reside in the CS.
Jeez. Now my lunch has gone all cold.

